On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Mark Brown<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:26:34PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> it could be. i was going by the changes that werent in 2.6.30. i >> thought i looked for previous submissions, but i must have missed >> previous attempts. i'm not familiar with alsa stuff, so i'm not > > The patch hadn't previously been sent in that form but it looks like > it's attempting to fix a bug which had had some previous goes at fixing > it that required updates. > >> always sure when i need to bang on Cliff to get things fixed up >> (changes split / better comments / etc...). > > If you're not sure there's a case for better changelogs at least! :) > >> if fixes miss a merge window, then that's an issue. but in general, >> users only see fixes per release, so sending things more quickly there >> wouldnt really help ? > > The issue is that things are missing merge windows - they're getting > sent in but if there's any review comments a revised version of the > patch isn't getting posted until the next batch of submissions. It's > these revisions rather than the initial submissions that I'm concerned > about. > This - f692fce - should not have reached upstream, how come ? _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
