On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:37:33AM +0200, Karl Beldan wrote: > This - f692fce - should not have reached upstream, how come ? The entire discussion of the patch occurred in response to my saying I'd applied it, with most of the discussion being a couple of days later after it'd have already gone into ALSA. Since nobody asked to have it reverted or indicated that there was any actual problem other than a repitition of code it wasn't reverted. For the most part repitition in ASoC would just be a no-op and therefore a code quality rather than behavioural issue. As I indicated when accepting the patch I've lowered my standards there for blackfin due to the past issues with iteration speed (which Mike has already said will be being addressed now). I've now reverted the shutdown hunk of the patch where duplication will actually introduce a bug. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
