FW: Re: United's flight number scheme (was Re: AC's 3xxx flight #s)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Per request for forwarding of message.


-----Original Message-----
From: allan9 [mailto:exatc@neo.rr.com]
Sent: January 27, 2002 3:48 PM
To: The Airline List; Matthew Montano
Subject: Re: Re: United's flight number scheme (was Re: AC's 3xxx flight
#s)


Matthew,

They (ATL) also will not use the phonetic Y (Yankee).  Used to fly a
Twin Beech N9312Y.  They called it Yolk.

Please repost this for the rest of the list.

Al
----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew Montano
To: AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: United's flight number scheme (was Re: AC's 3xxx flight #s)


As an aside, I've noticed that the phonetic alphabet standard is not all
that standard.

Atlanta ground control uses "Dixie", Chicago (and much of the rest of
the world) uses "Delta."

Thanks,

Matthew



-----Original Message-----
From: The Airline List [mailto:AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU] On Behalf Of W
Wilson
Sent: January 27, 2002 10:52 AM
To: AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU
Subject: Re: United's flight number scheme (was Re: AC's 3xxx flight #s)


Not really an issue, because of the international phonetic alphabet.
The numbers could be read individually. The Aeronautical Information
Manual reference for ATC communications can be found at
http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/aim/Chap4/aim0402.html.
Always a good read...LOL.

Walter
DCA

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]