Re: United's flight number scheme (was Re: AC's 3xxx flight #s)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just looked at this list again.  If I remember correctly, back in the 70's
and earlier,  the cargo flights were in the 8000 series

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb@postmodern.com>
To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:30
Subject: [AIRLINE] United's flight number scheme (was Re: AC's 3xxx flight
#s)


> As of a year or two ago, United's scheme was approximately this:
>
> UA1-UA2                                 Round-the-world flights (gone
now?)
> UA3-UA799                                       General domestic and
Canada flights
> UA800-899                                       Pacific flights (incl. US
continuation segments)
> UA900-999                                       Atlantic flights (incl. US
continuation segments)
> UA1000-1999                             General domestic and Canada
flights
> UA2000-2999                             Shuttle by United (gone now)
> UA3000-3999                             Code shares on other carriers
> UA4000-6999                             United Express (operated by
contractors)
> UA7000-7999                             Unused?  Charters?  Cargo?
> UA8000-8999                             Reserved for ATC renumbering*
> UA9000-9999                             Special flights - charters, extra
"passenger
> protection" sections,
>                                                         delivery and
repositioning flights, etc.
>
> Normally even numbers are eastbound, odd are westbound.
>
> * When flights with a similar or the same number would overlap in an ATC
> sector, one of the flights is renumbered, usually flight number +
> 8000.   For example, let's say UA921 operates LHR-ORD-LAX (with a change
> of equipment in ORD).  If the inbound from London is seriously delayed,
> UA may dispatch the domestic continuation (most of whose pax have no
> idea "their" flight is delayed inbound, since there's an empty 767
> sitting there at the gate), and the inbound LHR-LAX pax will be
> accommodated on other flights.   The domestic leg will be redesignated
> UA8921 for ATC purposes so it does not get confused with the "real"
> UA921 coming in from LHR.
>
> These schemes have been upset by the termination of Shuttle by United;
> it would be nice to know UA's current scheme, although I'm sure it is
> somewhat similar.
>
> --
> Michael C. Berch
> mcb@postmodern.com

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]