[Yum] "include" option in yum.conf?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 09:25:10AM -0700, Michael Stenner alleged:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:01:34PM -0700, Garrick Staples wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:00:42PM -0700, Garrick Staples alleged:
> > > > > Similar to apache:
> > > > > includepkgorder=includepkg,excludepkg
> > > > > or
> > > > > includepkgorder=excludepkg,includepkg
> > > > > 
> > > > > First match wins.
> > > > 
> > > > and when it is not listed?
> > > > 
> > > > -sv
> > > 
> > > *shrug*  Default to includepkg,excludepkg.
> > 
> > Or make it mandatory.  Specifying both options *must* also have an order
> > specified.
> 
> I have a severe dislike for unnecessarily mandatory options.  People
> who have sufficiently complex setups as to BOTH include and exclude
> the same package, should probably RTFM anyway.  It also adds another
> layer of complexity to the the code.

I'm just throwing out ideas and "community input" to help resolve Seth's
perceived problem with these options.

Playing devil's advocate for mandatory options... it would *force* people to
RTFM.  The natural inclination of most users is to just try the most obvious
solution before RTFMing.  If you, one of the developers, understands that the
user is going to miss vital information and that RTFMing will avoid landing
the bullet in his/her foot, then forcing the user here is a good thing.

Wider commentary... I think this point's to one of yum's wider problems: lack
of focus.  I asked once before (a long time ago), if yum was a convienence tool
to help out new users or if it was a power tool for advanced admins; the
question was never answered.  I know what *I* use it for, I know what some
other people use it for, and I also know how else I'd *like* to use it.  So I ask
again, what is yum's intended audience?

-- 
Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator
University of Southern California
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20040823/2dcaf5c7/attachment.bin

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux