On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:00:42PM -0700, Garrick Staples alleged: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 07:20:54PM -0400, seth vidal alleged: > > On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 15:30 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 04:00:44PM -0400, seth vidal alleged: > > > > my only question is the order of operations. > > > > > > > > if you have > > > > [repo] > > > > name=foo > > > > baseurl=someurl > > > > includepkgs=foo, bar, baz > > > > excludepkgs=baz, quux > > > > > > > > which order should those be taken in? and before you say anything I > > > > can't use the order they appear in the file, that has no meaning in > > > > ConfigParser, not really. > > > > > > Similar to apache: > > > includepkgorder=includepkg,excludepkg > > > or > > > includepkgorder=excludepkg,includepkg > > > > > > First match wins. > > > > and when it is not listed? > > > > -sv > > *shrug* Default to includepkg,excludepkg. Or make it mandatory. Specifying both options *must* also have an order specified. -- Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20040822/78a7224a/attachment.bin
