[Yum] Future of yum (was: Suggestion on yum download feedback and other things)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:45:16PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> I think the .hdr files will be replaced at some point in a hopefully
> not-so-distant-future version of yum. At that point the header download
> won't happen and it won't matter so I don't think implementing this
> download progress bar especially for them would be a good use of time.

Sound interesting. Is that related to the common backend discussion
for up2date, yum and apt? Care to give some more details?

Something must be downloaded, and I liked yum (with the not so recent
patches to keep timestamps on hdr files) for downloading only a
portion of what apt does (apt effectivly downloads all *.hdr files for
a single change due to the monolithic package files).

I assume a common backend could simply passively create the hdr files
by extracting them from the server's rpm, so that even non
yummed/apted/etc repos could be plugged in.

Is there perhaps a discussion about the common backend on another
list?
-- 
Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20030930/646e7311/attachment-0001.bin

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux