On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >> NACK > > You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you, > it can be me), don't you? going meta... What's this? All I know (... I think I know) about patch acceptance is that Anthony prefers to have at least one R-b. As far as I've seen this is not a hard requirement (for example, maintainers sometimes send unreviewed patches in a pull request, and on occasion they are merged). No words have been spent on NAKs yet (... since my subscription, that is). Is this stuff formalized somewhere? Sorry for wasting time... Thanks, Laszlo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list