Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>>>> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our >>>>> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side. >>>>> >>>>> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> ... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's existence >>>>> in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> So it's isa-pvpanic meaning "I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic" >> >> More like "we tested pvpanic for more than 2 weeks and did not find >> anything that's utterly broken in the design". >> >> And more practically "you are sure there are no traces of builtin >> pvpanic; also, panicked state is reversible". > > isa-pvpanic does not look like a sane way to say that. > > NACK You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you, it can be me), don't you? Paolo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list