Am 21.08.2013 19:02, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Il 21/08/2013 19:03, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>>> It is a source of pain, and the previous patch anyway changed the >>>> behavior of "-M pc-1.5" compared to the real 1.5. >>>> >>>> This also makes it clear that "-device pvpanic" is not enough: >>>> it will not expose pvpanic in fw_cfg properly. >>>> >>>> No idea how to fix that. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> >> That should be the first step. Make the device work properly. >> We'll discuss compatibility when that is clear. >> > > Actually these patches are not based on origin/master (my mistake)... I > haven't tested, rebasing should be enough if "-device pvpanic" was > tested properly for 1.6. I haven't tested myself but I remember seeing patches moving fw_cfg integration into the initfn/realizefn. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list