On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:06:21PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > >>>>> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our > >>>>> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side. > >>>>> > >>>>> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> ... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's existence > >>>>> in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> So it's isa-pvpanic meaning "I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic" > >> > >> More like "we tested pvpanic for more than 2 weeks and did not find > >> anything that's utterly broken in the design". > >> > >> And more practically "you are sure there are no traces of builtin > >> pvpanic; also, panicked state is reversible". > > > > isa-pvpanic does not look like a sane way to say that. > > > > NACK > > You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you, > it can be me), don't you? > > Paolo No I don't. -- MST -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list