Il 22/08/2013 14:43, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto: > On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > >>> NACK >> >> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you, >> it can be me), don't you? > > going meta... > > What's this? > > All I know (... I think I know) about patch acceptance is that Anthony > prefers to have at least one R-b. As far as I've seen this is not a hard > requirement (for example, maintainers sometimes send unreviewed patches > in a pull request, and on occasion they are merged). > > No words have been spent on NAKs yet (... since my subscription, that > is). Is this stuff formalized somewhere? > > Sorry for wasting time... No, it's not. But for example I NACKed removal of pvpanic from 1.6, it was overridden, and I didn't complain too much. Paolo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list