>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:53:01 -0400
> John.Florian@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > > From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Some other questions:
> > >
> > > Single git tree? Or tree per formula? A single one could get
> > > overlarge, multiple are harder to discover.
> >
> >
> > I've not personally used them, so I can't speak to their strengths or
> > weaknesses, but what about git submodules? (see "man git-submodule")
>
> Very interesting. Finally had time to sit down and play with them. ;)
>
> I think indeed this could help us. basically this allows you to add
> other git repos to one at specific states. So, we could have seperate
> git repos for formulas, then have several 'meta' repos. One for stable,
> one for test one for devel or something. In each of those you can setup
> submodules that point to whatever other repos you want and what commit
> they are on. So:
>
> foo.git - inital created formula
>
> Gets added as a submodule to formulas-dev.git
>
> Once it passes requirements,
>
> Gets added as a submodule to formulas-test.git
>
> each commit that passes whatever requirement, the commit thats pointed
> to will be changed by a commit to the formulas-test repo.
>
> Gets added as a submodule of formulas.git
>
> etc.
>
> Might work. I will try and write up a process/better expansion of
> this. ;)
>
Thanks for taking the time I wish I had to look into that and reporting your findings back here. What you propose does indeed sound like a useful organizational approach.
--
John Florian
_______________________________________________ formulas-devel mailing list formulas-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/formulas-devel
