Re: Problem with SD card

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Have you ever had this card work in anything?

And if you have used this card for a long time how long have you used it for ?

And where did you purchase the card from and when, and how much did it cost?

On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 11:43 AM Geoffrey Leach <geoffleach.gl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Answers to questions below. FWIW, on both systems a different SD card
> performs with no problem. That and the error message from e2fsck lead
> me to suspect that my problem is a bad superblock on the card. I've
> been unable to find any instructions on how to get e2fsck to mark the
> current superblock bad and create a new superblock.
>
> dmesg says
> [ +41.509460] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): recovery complete
> [  +0.001206] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): mounted filesystem
> 0fd984c4-cf88-408a-8ba5-15b64500bd5c r/w with ordered data mode. Quota
> mode: none. [Aug 7 20:36] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): unmounting filesystem
> 0fd984c4-cf88-408a-8ba5-15b64500bd5c. [  +5.667580] EXT4-fs
> (mmcblk0p1): recovery complete [  +0.001092] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1):
> mounted filesystem 0fd984c4-cf88-408a-8ba5-15b64500bd5c r/w with
> ordered data mode. Quota mode: none. [ +12.728248] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1):
> unmounting filesystem 0fd984c4-cf88-408a-8ba5-15b64500bd5c.
>
> The two systems are intel-based laptops running up-to-date Fedora 37.
> The original  problem system is a CLEVO W150HRM
>
>               *-device
>                    description: SD Card
>                    product: SD01T
>                    vendor: SanDisk
>                    physical id: aaaa
>                    logical name: /dev/mmcblk0
>                    version: 8.5
>                    date: 07/2022
>                    serial: 3601907256
>                    size: 953GiB (1023GB)
>                    capabilities: sd partitioned partitioned:dos
>                    configuration: logicalsectorsize=512 sectorsize=512
>               signature=09ca262d
>                  *-volume
>                       description: EXT4 volume
>                       vendor: Linux
>                       physical id: 1
>                       logical name: /dev/mmcblk0p1
>                       logical name: /Media/SDXC
>                       version: 1.0
>                       serial: 0fd984c4-cf88-408a-8ba5-15b64500bd5c
>                       size: 953GiB
>                       capacity: 953GiB
>                       capabilities: primary journaled
>               extended_attributes large_files huge_files dir_nlink
>               recover extents ext4 ext2 initialized
>                       configuration: created=2022-09-10 21:14:20
>                       filesystem=ext4 label=MP4
>                       lastmountpoint=/Media/SDXC modified=2022-10-07
>                       08:25:42 mount.fstype=ext4
>                       mount.options=rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime
>                       mounted=2022-10-07 08:25:42 state=mounted
>
> The second system is a StarLabs StarLab mk III Aside from more memory,
> SD main storage, more recent Intel CPU ... not much different :-)
> Despite all of that, the problem with the SD is the same.
>
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 18:23:12 -0500
> Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > What is in messages?  The sorts of errors you are getting indicate
> > that the card is simply not working at all for some reason on linux.
> >
> > And how different were the 2 systems that you tried it on?
> >
> > I have a nice 256G UHS-II card that works fine in my camera, but in
> > the laptop with the fastest mmc reader it will get a hard read error
> > that shows in dmesg/messages that prevents it from working at any
> > level.
> >
> > You need the errors coming out of the kernel.  Running commands from
> > userspace against the card won't tell you anything about what the
> > kernel itself thinks is wrong.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 5:52 PM Geoffrey Leach
> > <geoffleach.gl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reply.
> > >
> > > The SD card behaves the same way on another system (F37)
> > >
> > > In desperation, I removed all of the date and used gparted to delete
> > > and recreate the file system. It did than, then restored all of the
> > > deleted files.
> > >
> > > I have the new result below. It appears that I need to replace the
> > > superblock, but I've been unable to discover how to do that.
> > >
> > > # e2fsck  /dev/mmcblk0p1
> > > e2fsck 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
> > > MP4: recovering journal
> > > Superblock needs_recovery flag is clear, but journal has data.
> > > Run journal anyway<y>? yes
> > > e2fsck: unable to set superblock flags on MP4
> > > MP4: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors **********
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:05:17 -0500
> > > Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What does it show in messages after the mount?  That is where I
> > > > would expect the underlying read errors to be.
> > > >
> > > > I have also had some issues with certain sdxc readers seeming to
> > > > not work well with some cards.  There are also a significant
> > > > number of MMC changes going into the kernel recently.  There is
> > > > an entire new set of code (not sure if has made it into the
> > > > latest released kernel yet) for the UHS-II cards (All UHS-II
> > > > cards are working backwards compat for UHS-I).
> > > >
> > > > You might try a different machine/reader and see if it works on a
> > > > different one.   The issues I saw only happened with the larger
> > > > and/or faster cards and only in some readers.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 10:19 AM Geoffrey Leach
> > > > <geoffleach.gl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a 1TB SanDisk XC SD card, which has developed a
> > > > > reluctance to create files.
> > > > >
> > > > > UUID=0fd984c4-cf88-408a-8ba5-15b64500bd5c  /Media/SDXC   ext4
> > > > > noauto,rw,user 0 0
> > > > >
> > > > > % sudo mount /Media/SDXC
> > > > > % touch /Media/SDXC/foo
> > > > > % ls /Media/SDXC/foo
> > > > > /Media/SDXC/foo
> > > > > % sudo umount /Media/SDXC
> > > > > % sudo mount /Media/SDXC
> > > > > % ls /Media/SDXC/foo
> > > > > /bin/ls: cannot access '/Media/SDXC/foo': No such file or
> > > > > directory
> > > > >
> > > > > I used root to mount, just to be sure. User mount has the same
> > > > > problem. gparted reported a problem with the superblock which
> > > > > was resolved by re-formatting and re-creating the partition
> > > > > table. The card has just one partition.
> > > > >
> > > > > Suggestions for further diagnosis would be appreciated.
> > >
> > >
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux