Re: ssh infested by systemd.resolved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Hennebry writes:

 > The point seems to have been missed.

The same could be said here, but it would be valid.

 > The primary salutary effect of a *collective*
 > decision would be on prospective smokers,
 > e.g. children.

You make me curious what experience in open source maintenance you have.

In mine, again, that's true for smokers, not so for volunteer
maintainers.  Over the years in several projects, one fairly toxic,
others more polite, I've seen potential maintainers (and list
moderators) balk at taking responsibility because of visible
harrassment from users.  There just isn't a whole generation of
"young" users waiting to grow into "adult smoker" maintainers the way
a half-century ago there was a whole generation of children waiting to
grow into adult smokers *because* that was a mark of adulthood.  Few
users *want* to be maintainers, so any disincentive to accepting
responsibility that isn't itself productive work is a bad idea when
dealing with volunteers.

The other thing I've seen happen more than once is that the people
doing the work set up alternative channels, or even go to private
channels.  The rules there are not necessarily "safe space", either,
but pure harassment about WONTFIX issues gets one ejected.  You'll
notice that the people defending the decision here aren't the people
who made it -- *they* escaped to some other channel long ago.

Harassing volunteer maintainers in open source is just a toxic lose-
lose proposition.  Even if they're so bad you just want them gone,
forking the project is almost always cheaper, faster, and more
effective.  You don't get that trifecta often in software, take it
while the taking's good. :-D

Steve
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux