Re: ssh infested by systemd.resolved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Hennebry writes:

 > I also know of no technical argument on the
 > fedora forum that persuaded fedora's authors.

As far as I know there isn't really a technical argument for systemd
or any particular systemd.* on Fedora workstations.  The various
traditional inits and daemons work fine in that environment.[1]

I have seen technical arguments for systemd and its modules made in
the context of servers, though (search the lists for Lennart
Poettering (sp?), you'll find some pretty quick, and there are plenty
that he didn't make, too, I just don't have an easy search key for
them).  Since it's the server industry that pays geld for RHEL, and
often contributes dollars and dev time to Fedora as well, they're
going to be listened to for server editions.  And then maintainers are
going to think "we have to keep the paying customers satisfied, and
we'd really prefer to maintain only one subsystem for each purpose".
Pretty clearly that one subsystem is going to be the one the large
customers/donors prefer for their business systems.

If you're talking about whatever bit of code is annoying the OP, well,
if you put maintenance of your system's software in the hands of third
parties, you're either going to have to put up with such annoyance
sometimes because maintainers are neither omniscient to foresee all
problems, nor omnipotent to program away all the problems they do
foresee.  Or you're going to have to take an active role in the
maintenance of the software systems you depend on.

 > One way to get rid of smoking would be for non-smokers
 > to make a collective decision to make fun of smokers.

That might work for smoking, although more likely because the smokers
will leave when they see you coming, rather than because they stop
smoking.  But "leaving when they see you coming" is not exactly what
you're hoping for from maintainers.


Footnotes: 
[1]  However, maintenance on non-systemd software is going to decrease
over time, and eventually it's all going to be "legacy" and riddled
with technical debt -- and that will be the technical argument.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux