Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:19 AM, lee wrote: > >> The bug --- or call it misstatement if you like --- is with systemd in >> that things can still be started even when they are disabled. >> > > Err. no. Before systemd, the equivalent of mask simply didn't exist and > there was no systematic way to disable dynamically started services. So in > sysvinit, if a service is D-Bus activated, you had no good way to control > that. systemd for the first time harmonized that process. That is irrelevant. I don't know what you don't understand --- "disabled" means disabled, i. e. cannot be started. Systemd is buggy because when you disable a service, the service can still be started. That means that the service is not disabled. Besides, dbus shouldn't start any services, that would be insane. -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
