Joe Zeff <joe@xxxxxxx> writes: > On 07/08/2014 11:40 PM, lee wrote: >> When something is disguised or hidden, it is not disabled. It is >> camouflaged or concealed. Camouflage, concealment, hiding, disguise and >> masking can all be used for*preventing* from being disabled. > > No. When a service is disabled it can still be started after boot, > but when it's masked, it can't be started at all. That the service can still be started means that it is *not* disabled. > Do understand that I'm defending neither systemd nor the deveolper's > choice of terminology. I'm merely correcting what looks like a > misstatement of how it works. The bug --- or call it misstatement if you like --- is with systemd in that things can still be started even when they are disabled. -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
