On 07/06/2014 03:53 AM, lee wrote: > Glenn Holmer <shadowm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On 07/05/2014 06:21 PM, Tim wrote: >>> Allegedly, on or about 05 July 2014, Patrick O'Callaghan sent: >>> The old system was considered bad, because it had 6 run levels, of which >>> a few of them were never used. Now we have 12? >> >> Twelve different types of *units*, of which service and target are two. >> A target is like a runlevel (it groups units together), except that more > > Then systemd is broken by design. A shepherd is *not* a type of sheep. systemd is broken because you don't like the terms it uses? Really? "Target" makes perfect sense: to reach a certain target, enable the units in its list. > And why would so many types of units be needed? http://www.lyonlabs.org/just-rtfm.jpg -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
