Glenn Holmer <shadowm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 07/06/2014 03:53 AM, lee wrote: >> Glenn Holmer <shadowm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On 07/05/2014 06:21 PM, Tim wrote: >>>> Allegedly, on or about 05 July 2014, Patrick O'Callaghan sent: >>>> The old system was considered bad, because it had 6 run levels, of which >>>> a few of them were never used. Now we have 12? >>> >>> Twelve different types of *units*, of which service and target are two. >>> A target is like a runlevel (it groups units together), except that more >> >> Then systemd is broken by design. A shepherd is *not* a type of sheep. > > systemd is broken because you don't like the terms it uses? Really? It is not true that a shepherd is a type of sheep. Wrong usage of terms --- or call it flawed logic --- is by design, meaning it's broken by design, regardless whether I like it or not. > "Target" makes perfect sense: to reach a certain target, enable the > units in its list. A target is not a unit then. >> And why would so many types of units be needed? > > http://www.lyonlabs.org/just-rtfm.jpg I don't want to read the documentation. Some of it was quoted here in a posting, and that piece was badly written and confusing. -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
