On 07/07/2014 04:47 PM, lee wrote:
Glenn Holmer<shadowm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>On 07/07/2014 04:34 AM, lee wrote:
>>The authors of systemd don't even understand what "disabled" means.
>
>A pretty bold statement. Disabled means the same thing it does in
>sysvinit: the service won't start at boot time.
But it might start any time later because it's not disabled when you
disable it.
In systemd, a service that's disabled won't be directly started at boot,
but another service can still start it either at boot or later. To keep
a service from being started by systemd under any circumstances, you
need to mask it. I think that the idea is to make a distinction between
services that are only started when something needs them and services
that aren't started at all.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
