On 02/17/2013 05:22 PM, jonc wrote:
On 02/17/2013 04:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.02.2013 22:35, schrieb jonc:
It's my understanding that Fedora's primary role is to evaluate and
explore software for Red Hat, not necessarily
to produce a stable consumer-level product. That's very much
Ubuntu's mission, but it isn't Fedora's. I expect
Ubuntu not to break. I expect Fedora to break. Oddly, in my own
experience, they both break about the same amount.
i expect NO DISTRIBUTION to break
I don't think meeting that criterion is part of Fedora's objectives,
any more than it is part of Debian Sid's objectives. People may or may
not agree that Fedora follows an appropriate development path, but it
seems obvious that pushing the edges is antithetical to producing a
rock-solid distribution.
Fedora 18 with Gnome Shell has been pretty good for me. Can I say
that about every Fedora release? No. There was a release, for
instance, that I couldn't install. So, if this F18 installation goes
up in smoke, I'll move on, no hard feelings. And, certainly, if I was
doing anything that *had* to be break-free, I wouldn't be using
Fedora. I'd most likely (go back) to using CentOS.
Judging by your last statement am I to assume that CentOS is more
"reliable" than Fedora?...
EGO II
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
