On 01/31/2013 04:44 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: > On 01/27/2013 06:15 PM, Lailah wrote: >> El vie, 25-01-2013 a las 22:40 +0100, Frantisek Hanzlik escribió: >>> Joe Zeff wrote: >>> > On 01/25/2013 12:46 PM, James Freer wrote: >>> >> LOL - good reply! I must admit i do get fed up with the twin names. In >>> >> the Precise version... it was very much IMprecise. Just too many bugs >>> >> now to be worth using. >>> > >>> > It often seems to me that they're too concerned about making their names >>> > cute for my taste, but I don't use it myself and keep my opinion to >>> > myself for the most. Now, alas, it's beginning to look like Fedora's >>> > going down that path instead of marketing itself as a serious distro for >>> > people who are more interested in how it works than in what it's called. >>> > Alas, from what I can see, unless I'm active as a Fedora dev (My >>> > programming skills rusted away decades ago.) the only input I have to the >>> > process is making suggestions. None of us "mere users" have a vote. >>> > I'd guess, it's people being dissatisfied with what they are used to, now being on a "quest for the better". That said, from what I've heard and read, Ubuntu is in a similar crisis as Fedora. What is Gnome3 in Fedora seems to be Unity in Ubuntu (users turning away), what's the anaconda-disaster in F18 seems to be a general stability in Ubuntu 12.10.
Of what stability are you talking about? In Ubuntu I couldn't find it. And Unity is worse than Gnome 3.
Just my experience
Lailah
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org