On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Ondrej Majerech <oxyd.oxyd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24 January 2013 16:14, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > How about no schedule? When something worth releasing is done, declare >> > it is time for a new release. Could be 6 months, could be 2 years. >> >> Now, that is something to think about!! >> If the current approach isn´t working, let´s try different. :) > > > Sounds like the approach Enlightenment developers took -- "We'll release it > when we're done fiddling with it!" It took them 12 years to release E17 > after E16. I think that's taking it to extremes a bit really. This is the plans for ubuntu... i don't know whetehr Fedora started 6 month release or followed ubuntu - but ubuntu are considering giving up. http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/01/ubuntu-considers-huge-change-that-would-end-traditional-release-cycle/ Do a google 'ubuntu rolling release' and see what else comes up. james -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
