On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 07:59:21PM +0000, James Freer wrote: > I have the greatest respect for the developer's that put in > considerable effort for each release. The problem with 6 month release > cycle is too little time. I've used linux now for almost 6 years with Having some experience with timing development cycles in agile/scrum, the problem with a longer release cycle is that the amount of work bitten off grows to match, and you end up with the same scramble on a bigger scale, actually making the problem worse rather than better. I think we should keep on a six-month release cycle but also have "epic" planning for features across cycles. There was a suggestion at Fudcon to move to using point releases, each point with a six-month cycle but with a bigger two-year cycle wrapping a series of releases together. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
