Olav Vitters writes:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:48:28PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Having every appp implement a version of NoSquint makes so much more > sense than gdm passing through the right option to Xorg! Do you honestly expect anyone to respond to you? I mean, anyone who actually bothers to makes changes?
Of course I am not under any illusions that anyone "who actually bothers to make changes" really is going to respond in any meaningful way. Not to me, not to anyone else, for that matter. At least, that's been true for some time. Certainly there might be some rare exceptions, but this is going to be true much more often than not.
I few emails ago I mentioned that most developers tend to ignore various threads. It seems on one hand you go out of your way to be impolite, while on the other hand you complain that people don't do what you want.
I don't believe I ever demanded anyone to do anything. When did I make any such demand?
I simply observed, and summarized, what's been the case for some period of time now, and is likely to remain the status quo for the foreseeable future.
Attachment:
pgp_yitDNpHrk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
