On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 09:04 -0400, Rich Mattes wrote: > You're using the correct patch (the rosintegration-v2 patch.) It was > created against PCL 1.6.0, so it should apply cleanly when using the > current srpm. I tried it last night, and it seems to be working OK (I > didn't sit through the whole build process though, just through CMake > and the first couple files) Hi Rich, I think the other patches are conflicting with the ros integration patch: Patch0: PCL-1.4.0-Source-fedora.patch Is this patch still required? It's for 1.4? My spec is here: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/5892/93885136 > The build that I tried last night was against the ROS Fuerte underlay > from my copr[1], if you're interested I could create a ros-fuerte-pcl > srpm and build it there pretty easily. At the moment, I need to run fuerte on my fedora system for work, somehow. It'd be great if you could provide a pcl package that would work :) PS: The project I'm working on might shift to Groovy in the near future. Some folks tried it and said that there are huge improvements in Groovy. I might look into packaging Groovy in the near future. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" Please only print if necessary. Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ robotics mailing list robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
