On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 13:26 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > The need for ACL's by default that restrict the package to only the > > package maintainers is not clear and package maintainers are not aware > > that ACL are added by default to their packages. If it is explicitly > > documented that ACL's are added by default that solves the latter > > problem. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JeremyKatz/DraftPackageAccess > > Jeremy, want to push that to finalized? While useful in and of itself, we really need to revisit the idea of a developer's guide... having lots of little pages like this one is really good for people that want to know. But it sucks if I'm a new maintainer and have to then dredge through 20 bazillion (okay, exaggeration :-) pages on the wiki. At the same time, I'll clean this one up and we can get it into what we've got for now at least Jeremy -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
