Re: ACL removal day?!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 21:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I would go further. Even for existing packages, package maintainers must specify good reasons for retaining ACL's and that must be documented explicitly in some prominent place.

Absolutely. And the existing ACLs which were added without the knowledge
or consent of the package maintainer should be removed immediately.

How do we know which ones were added without knowledge/consent? I for one know about them, and require them for some packages I own. I don't believe this info is tracked anywhere though.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux