Re: use disttag ".1" for devel to avoid confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:56:50PM -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:

Why is it better with a disttag, out of curiosity?

It is easier to copy over spec files for the different versions. Those
are rebuilt quite often in any case for changes in gcc/libc,
so there isn't much gain in avoiding disttag changes (like it is for
packages less often rebuilt like noarch packages).

How often do those change ABI on stable released versions? Why would it need a rebuild on e.g. FC6?

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux