Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:31:56PM -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
My argument is that if packages don't get updated that often, disttag is
rather useless as the chances are low that it will get a fedora udpate
pushed. And on the off-chance it does, diverging a specfile once is not
a big deal.
I think this is _NOT_ the current state of affairs else we would not
have as many .fc6 packages as we do in F-7. Those packages should have
the disttag removed IMO.
Maybe some, but not necessarily all of them. Taking myself as an
example, I own some python modules that may certainly be better without
disttag, but I also have C/C++ stuff that, although stable and
unfrequently updated are certainly better with a disttag.
Why is it better with a disttag, out of curiosity?
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
