On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:31:56PM -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote: > > My argument is that if packages don't get updated that often, disttag is > rather useless as the chances are low that it will get a fedora udpate > pushed. And on the off-chance it does, diverging a specfile once is not > a big deal. > > I think this is _NOT_ the current state of affairs else we would not > have as many .fc6 packages as we do in F-7. Those packages should have > the disttag removed IMO. Maybe some, but not necessarily all of them. Taking myself as an example, I own some python modules that may certainly be better without disttag, but I also have C/C++ stuff that, although stable and unfrequently updated are certainly better with a disttag. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
