>>>>> "CW" == Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: CW> As time wore on, for a variety of reasons the decision was made CW> (by FESCo?) to treat the review tix as "advisory" and not blocking CW> a package's inclusion in the Brave Merged World. It's should be pretty obvious to anyone that even assuming quick responses from the maintainers, we just didn't have the review pool necessary to get those merge review tickets done in time for F7. A bunch of us locked ourselves in a room at fudcon and still didn't make all that much progress. It was just too much work. CW> Now that we've achieved BMWness and F-7 is out the door, I think CW> there should be a renewed emphasis on merge reviews, with a CW> timeframe and actual consequences for non-review. Well, first I'd like to see some information from Red Hat folks about what we can actually require. What kind of enforcement can we get? Can someone actually force maintainers to deal with their merge review comments? RHEL5 and F7 are out, so it seems that we're in a good position to find just a little developer time and hopefully we can make a dent in them. But currently I'm trying to make more progress on the other review tickets, because I feel that the new contributor experience is more important right now. Only after that is under control do I want to spend more time doing merge reviews (besides those which I've promised to do). - J< -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
