On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 02:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Brian Pepple wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:50 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > >> On 6/4/07, Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Now that Fedora 7 is out the door, I'd like to ask what the plans are > >>> for the big Merge Review. > >>> There are still a lot of unassigned tickets, and I think all the > >>> people working on the Review since january (thanks!) could use some > >>> help. > >>> Maybe we can do another Review Day before F-8? > >> This is something I'd personally like to see FESCo address. If memory > >> serves, originally the intent of the merge reviews was to make sure > >> core packages were reviewed and complied to guidelines like any other > >> package. As time wore on, for a variety of reasons the decision was > >> made (by FESCo?) to treat the review tix as "advisory" and not > >> blocking a package's inclusion in the Brave Merged World. > > > > the plan is to have these bug be blockers for F8. > > What happens when package reviews don't finish because the reviewers > don't review it or package maintainers fix up the packages? Do we pull > out packages (what if this was the kernel or glibc?) or delay release or > is there other ideas? That is one of the items we are still discussing. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
