On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 11:40 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:54:00 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 03:30:34AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Simo Sorce writes: > > > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 22:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:08:02PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > >>> Why do we need fixed uids at all? is it so difficult to use > > > >>> getpwnam() ?? > > > > Indeed, most of the packages we're talking about (if not all) don't > > need a fixed uid/gid at all. > > Once and for all: if they require a fixed (= constant) uid/gid and still > use fedora-usermgmt, the packages are broken. +1 Without flame intentions, I think fedora-usermgmt is simply a bad idea in any possible case. Simo. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
