On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 11:40:55AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:54:00 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 03:30:34AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Simo Sorce writes: > > > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 22:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:08:02PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > >>> Why do we need fixed uids at all? is it so difficult to use > > > >>> getpwnam() ?? > > > > Indeed, most of the packages we're talking about (if not all) don't > > need a fixed uid/gid at all. > > Once and for all: if they require a fixed (= constant) uid/gid and still > use fedora-usermgmt, the packages are broken. Fully agreed. And if they don't they are more then adequately served by plain useradd. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpUux45mqIqP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
