>>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> writes: HdG> I fully agree this new process is a PITA. The old process worked HdG> very well, what problems where there with the old process that HdG> this new process is trying to fix? The fact that bugzilla creaks, groans and ultimately dies when faced with a blocker bug having 1500 dependencies. The previous system just doesn't scale to all of the core review stuff. Now, we could just treat the core review as an anomaly and go back to the old system for old reviews. Or we could move forward with a refinement of the new process that works better. Either way is fine with me as long as it works. What's annoying is that people whining because something has changed. We've tried something new because we needed to. The whole thing is a work in progress. Deal. If we never try anything new, we'll never do worse but we also won't ever do any better. - J< -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
