On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 10:50 -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 07:31:51AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > > Alan, you've mentioned this trashing twice in this thread. Do you have > > anything more than anecdotal evidence about this? If we are to take > > your recommendation seriously, how do you recommend we measure the > > robustness of git? > > In my case I was doing a rebase and the box crashed. End of repository > had to haul diffs out of log files by hand. Do you have a tarball of this repository? I'd like to do a post-mortem. I don't actually believe it was trashed, unless the crash of the box _also_ scribbled on the filesystem, in which case all bets are off. And a rebase on the _server_ side isn't a use case we're interested in anyway -- server repositories we only ever push to; never merge or commit locally. Not that it makes your alleged problem any less serious in the general case, of course. -- dwmw2 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
