On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:06:10 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > C) an upstream that is actually willing to listen to our problems and fix > them or help us to fix them I'll strongly disagree with that as a point in favor of hg over git. Not that hg upstream is not responsive, (I have no reason to suspect that). But my experience with git upstream has been that it is extremely responsive. I ran into a few UI bugs that were real shockers at first, (like "git rm" didn't exist), and upstream accepted my suggestions and patches for things like that as readily as I could expect any project to do so. -Carl
Attachment:
pgpaaQjH66iwB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
