On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 09:49 -0500, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > > This entire line of thinking is ridiculous (on both sides). We should > > just stop discussing this now, because it's not going to result in > > anything productive and will probably deteriorate into a flamewar soon. > > > > Different programs are written in different languages. Each language > > has advantages and disadvantages. Code quality is more a product of the > > author than the language. Leave it at that. > > Also, the implementation does matter, but it's not a matter of religion. > It's a question of whether or not it gets us further towards our goals. So... if we discount the religious issue of the language it's written in, why _would_ we consider using Hg instead of git? I'd be much happier with git. The recent proliferation of version control systems isn't a good thing -- I strongly believe that in general we should stick with CVS where it's good (or entrenched) enough, and use git for for the rest. -- dwmw2 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
