On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 08:31 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 14 November 2006 01:17, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Is the cost of disk a deciding factor? You were comparing fully packed > > repositories, I hope? > > It's not a huge factor, but it is something to consider as we toss 5K packages > on a server. Yes, I'm using fully packed repos as the reference point. Some > package sets are actually larger than CVS, some are smaller. Once I've done > the full conversion (takes much longer than with hg) I can do an overall > comparison. The fact that I have to know about repacking, but not just > repacking, repacking with special -a and -d flags just to get the damn thing > to repack seems pretty ridiculous to me. Why wouldn't a cvs import > automatically repack and prune after the import? As far as I can tell, the git-cvsimport script _does_ repack for itself (with -d -a) after every 1024 commits it imports. This is the standard Fedora Extras package (git-core-1.4.2.4-1.fc6), which has been installed here since October 20th. Perhaps it ought to repack when it's finished too. A simple enough RFE -- but you'll probably want a cron job repacking all repos periodically anyway. > # Changed but not updated: > # (use git-update-index to mark for commit) > At this point I went on a wild goose chase on what the "index" was and why > wasn't it being updated. It finally took reading every line of the commit > man page to realize that unlike the first commit, I have to add a -a in order > to commit any changes. That or glance at the result of 'git-update-index --help' and observe that it takes files as an argument. Initial teething problems and misunderstandings are not criteria on which to base a decision like this. If we _are_ still at that stage of the investigation, then we should definitely stick with CVS for now. > > Please, be specific. > > Ask Adam Jackson (ajax). I'm asking you specifically, because you were the one who claimed it as one of _your_ reasons. -- dwmw2 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly