On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 03:19:28AM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > >What I'd like to see is > > > >o general consensus about disapprovement of the FUD in the bugzilla > > (I think this has almost already happened) > > I would like to see valid opinions not be classified as "FUD" just > because you don't agree with them. No, it's beyond not agreeing. It's about you creating fear, uncertainty and doubts w/o real facts to back up doomsday. > >o A netiquette and deescalation mechanism like some quoted to put in > > place for future similar situations > > > >It just can't be accepted that people with a fedora account represent > >the project in such an inappropriate way! > > Creating a repository that forks Fedora and essentially creates its > own distribution and puts the burdon on the community to support two > separate distributions is much more inappropriate as far as I'm > concerned. It just can't be accepted that repository maintainers > represent the project in such an inappropriate way! Is there an echo in here? ATrpms does not fork Fedora it is a 3rd party repository supporting among other Fedora. There is no burden on you to support anything, and stop calling yourself "community" ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpH4MQ0vwUio.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
