On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:54:55AM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > >You started a completely unmotivated raging crusade against my > >packaging work, and now try to hide behind "constructivism"? > > > >This thread is about your bad behaviour/fudding, not any existing or > >non-existing technical issues. Don't try to divert from that, please. > > My FUDing is *nothing* compared to the damage your repository has done > by forking Fedora and essentially creating your own distribution. If > this thread is about FUDing, it should have ended LONG ago. This thread *is* about fudding, check the subject. > We are *trying* to get this thread off the FUD issue and onto more > important issues which have to deal with potential bugs in packages. > But you seem to think FUDing is a far more important issue to discuss. "Off the FUD issue": Are you admitting to have been fudding? Let's get the FUD issue resolved and we'll worry about *true* technical issues in another thread. What I'd like to see is o general consensus about disapprovement of the FUD in the bugzilla (I think this has almost already happened) o A netiquette and deescalation mechanism like some quoted to put in place for future similar situations It just can't be accepted that people with a fedora account represent the project in such an inappropriate way! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgppmlLr7WHOj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
