Re: Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/16/06, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> wrote:
Chris, Axel,

Can we please either have a constructive discussion or may I request
that you fight this out by private mail instead?

Time to end this flamefest.

I am trying my best to be constructive here Hans.

I very much want to end the flamebait parts of this thread, but it
takes two to make that happen.  I sincerly hope we can concentrate on
the real issues.  But what I consider a real issue seems to be
different than what Axel considers to be a real issue.

For clarity, I think the real issue is ATrpms forking Fedora by
overriding base packages; while it seems Axel thinks the real issue is
the "FUD" I am spreading about his repository.

I sincerly hope we can discuss the impact of repositories overriding
base packages instead of flaimbait for FUD issues.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux