On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 06:28:48PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 00:24 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > There is no official Fedora codex or similar, but I'd still like to > > know what happens when a contributor suddenly becomes insane and is > > aggressively fudding other contributors like Christopher Stone does in > > a bugzilla report, see > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210775 > > > > Note that I never had any direct contact with this person (or at least > > I don't remember). > > > > > 1. Fud is not a verb. It's not even a word. Let's stop using it as such. Let's not nipick, language is evolving, and unless we use it as a verb, it will never make it into the next dictionary as such. ;) Also it does sound unfair for a native speaker of a language to nitpick on s/o non-native, right? > 2. He appears to be stating his opinion, which he is welcome to do. Yes, we live in a free world, is that what you mean? I thus prefer to escalate this and state my opinion here. > You can counter his opinion by responding to him No, I won't get trolled. I'm known for getting into discussion with people, but IMHO he already crossed a line. All this FUD was dumped into bugzilla w/o any provocation or reason. Just because s/o mentioned ATrpms doesn't count as provocation. > but there's no 'censure' process if that's what you're gunning for. No, censoring is always bad, that doesn't mean that such behaviour shouldn't be counteracted. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpGuvggBbVCx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
