On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 04:14:46PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish here Axel. It's not about me, but about what you are trying to do. > You seem to be completely ignoring the **FACT** that Fedora users > who use ATrpms end up with messed up systems in which they can no > longer properly upgrade using yum. That is what I call FUD. I count a dozen thousand unique daily visitors on ATrpms' master mirror and if one could get metrics from the other mirrors there would be quite a huge number. So there are ~ 15000 users with broken systems daily? Or are do they all belong to the category "have been very lucky" as you write in bugzilla? > Why don't we change this from a "this guy is spreading FUD" > discussion, to an actual technical discussion No, I won't accept that what you bugzilla'd had anything to do with any of your technical insight on the matter (you never even used ATrpms as you wrote, so you have no idea if there are issues, but still "countless" users are consulting you). You won't get away with trying to divert to technical matters, now. I'm always for discussing technical stuff, perhaps too much for some people, but this is about you spreading FUD against a fellow contributor. > Or would you prefer to ingore the actual underlying technical issue > we (not just me) are trying to get through to you. Don't troll. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpCkzWptHINn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
