On 10/16/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Off the FUD issue": Are you admitting to have been fudding? Let's get the FUD issue resolved and we'll worry about *true* technical issues in another thread.
I will admit that I could have been more tactful. I will admit it is possible to use ATrpms without messing up your system. I will admit that many people use ATrpms without any problems. That being said, I will continue to encourage people to *NOT* use ATrpms as long as the repository continues to override base packages.
What I'd like to see is o general consensus about disapprovement of the FUD in the bugzilla (I think this has almost already happened)
I would like to see valid opinions not be classified as "FUD" just because you don't agree with them.
o A netiquette and deescalation mechanism like some quoted to put in place for future similar situations It just can't be accepted that people with a fedora account represent the project in such an inappropriate way!
Creating a repository that forks Fedora and essentially creates its own distribution and puts the burdon on the community to support two separate distributions is much more inappropriate as far as I'm concerned. It just can't be accepted that repository maintainers represent the project in such an inappropriate way! -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
