As an experiment, I added the ATrpms repository to my /etc/yum.repos.d/ directory and ran yum check-update. In theory, adding a new repository and running check-update should not list ANY packages, however this is what check-update listed as needing updating: alsa-lib.i386 1.0.13-32.fc5.at atrpms alsa-lib.x86_64 1.0.13-32.fc5.at atrpms alsa-lib-devel.x86_64 1.0.13-32.fc5.at atrpms bash-completion.noarch 20060301-10.at atrpms directfb.x86_64 0.9.25.1-9.rhfc5.at atrpms fetchmail.x86_64 6.3.4-1.1_6.fc5.at atrpms ffmpeg.x86_64 0.4.9-17_r6524.fc5.at atrpms fftw.x86_64 3.1.2-11.fc5.at atrpms lame.x86_64 3.96.1-13.fc5.at atrpms libdvdcss.x86_64 1.2.9-3.fc5.at atrpms libgcrypt.x86_64 1.2.3-13.fc5.at atrpms libgcrypt.i386 1.2.3-13.fc5.at atrpms libgcrypt-devel.x86_64 1.2.3-13.fc5.at atrpms libgpg-error.i386 1.4-9.fc5.at atrpms libgpg-error.x86_64 1.4-9.fc5.at atrpms libgpg-error-devel.x86_64 1.4-9.fc5.at atrpms libmad.x86_64 0.15.1b-3.fc5.at atrpms libquicktime.x86_64 0.9.9-16.fc5.at atrpms libsndfile.x86_64 1.0.16-8.fc5.at atrpms libusb.x86_64 0.1.12-5.0.99.fc5.at atrpms libusb-devel.x86_64 0.1.12-5.0.99.fc5.at atrpms lirc.x86_64 0.8.1-62_cvs20060930.f atrpms lm_sensors.i386 2.10.1-45.fc5.at atrpms lm_sensors.x86_64 2.10.1-45.fc5.at atrpms mjpegtools.x86_64 1.9.1-14_cvs20061009.f atrpms mpeg2dec.x86_64 0.4.0b-2.fc5.at atrpms mplayer.x86_64 4:1.0-56_r19856.fc5.at atrpms mplayer-fonts.noarch 4:1.0-7.at atrpms mplayer-skins.noarch 4:1.0-pre3_13.at atrpms mplayerplug-in.x86_64 3.31-29.fc5.at atrpms openct.x86_64 0.6.9-7.fc5.at atrpms opensc.x86_64 0.11.1-7.fc5.at atrpms perl-Pod-POM.noarch 0.17-6.fc5.at atrpms perl-Text-Autoformat.noarch 1.13-4.fc5.at atrpms perl-Text-Reform.noarch 1.11-6.fc5.at atrpms perl-XML-XPath.noarch 1.13-5.fc5.at atrpms pinentry.x86_64 0.7.2-12.fc5.at atrpms pm-utils.x86_64 0.15-1.5cubbi_suspend2 atrpms sgml-common.noarch 0.6.3-17_12.at atrpms spamassassin.x86_64 3.1.7-36.fc5.at atrpms transcode.x86_64 1.0.2-27.fc5.at atrpms xml-common.noarch 0.6.3-17_12.at atrpms xvidcore.x86_64 1.1.0-9.fc5.at atrpms I'm not sure how many of these packages are actually FC/FE packages, but it goes to show the extent of package conflicts between ATrpms and other repositories. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly