On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 01:09 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 06:43:04PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > okay - but you seem to want something other than just to state your > > opinion. If I misread that and you just want to state your counter > > opinion here then I'm sorry, have a blast. > > As I wrote, I don't know what happens when someone starts acting that > way. I think this is hurting the community and creating chasms where > bridges are trying to be built. And I'm not referring to any > scare to non-existent technical parts of the statements made. > > > > > You can counter his opinion by responding to him > > > > > > No, I won't get trolled. I'm known for getting into discussion with > > > people, but IMHO he already crossed a line. All this FUD was dumped > > > into bugzilla w/o any provocation or reason. Just because s/o > > > mentioned ATrpms doesn't count as provocation. > > > > Have you read bugzilla? It's filled with all sorts of stuff I don't > > agree with. > > Sure, and a part of it probably stems from Jeff Johnson, whose > comments escalated to the board and people wanted to withdraw his > bugzilla account (I'm far from recommending doing so in this case, > don't misunderstand me, I'm just showing that sometimes some reaction > is needed). Not quite. I believe it was more the fact that he was closing bugs when they shouldn't be, rather than his comments. That's different than what is occurring here. josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
