Re: Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 06:15:56PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> As an experiment, I added the ATrpms repository to my
> /etc/yum.repos.d/ directory and ran yum check-update.  In theory,
> adding a new repository and running check-update should not list ANY
> packages, however this is what check-update listed as needing
> updating:

So? ATrpms has some needs to replace some core packages. Does this
break your system?  No, it does not.

> I'm not sure how many of these packages are actually FC/FE packages,

Any package with a multimedia stamp on it is known not to be part of
FC. Don't add overlaps between ATrpms and other non-FC repos to
magnify your argument.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgptv0eebjcVS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux